0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

±Ç¿ª¿Ü»ó¼¾ÅÍ °£È£»çÀÇ ÀÌÂ÷ ¿Ü»ó¼º ½ºÆ®·¹½º¿Í ¼Ò¸íÀǽÄÀÌ ÀÌÁ÷Àǵµ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ

Influence of Secondary Trauma Stress, and Vocation on Turnover Intention of Nurses in Regional Trauma Centers

°£È£ÇàÁ¤ÇÐȸÁö 2020³â 26±Ç 1È£ p.65 ~ 72
KMID : 0614820200260010065
ÀÌÇö°ü ( Lee Hyun-Gwan ) - °¡Ãµ´ëÇб³ ±æº´¿ø

±èÁö¼ö ( Kim Ji-Soo ) - °¡Ãµ´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ

Abstract

º» ¿¬±¸¸ñÀûÀº ÀÌÂ÷ ¿Ü»ó¼º ½ºÆ®·¹½º¿Í ¼Ò¸íÀǽÄÀÌ ±Ç¿ª¿Ü»ó¼¾ÅÍ °£È£»çÀÇ ÀÌÁ÷Àǵµ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» ÆľÇÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¸¦ À§ÇØ ¼³¹®Áö¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÑ ¼­¼úÀû Ⱦ´ÜÁ¶»ç¿¬±¸¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÚ·áÁ¶»ç´Â 10°³ º´¿øÀÇ ±Ç¿ª¿Ü»ó¼¾ÅÍ¿¡ ±Ù¹«ÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Â 170¸íÀÇ °£È£»ç¿¡°Ô ½Ç½ÃµÇ¾ú°í, ÀÚ·á¼öÁý ±â°£Àº 2019³â 3¿ùºÎÅÍ 4¿ù±îÁö¿´´Ù. ¿¬±¸°á°ú, ÀÌÂ÷ ¿Ü»ó¼º ½ºÆ®·¹½º´Â 50Á¡ ¸¸Á¡¿¡ 27.66Á¡À̾ú°í, ¼Ò¸íÀǽÄÀº 54Á¡ ¸¸Á¡¿¡ 36.04Á¡À̾úÀ¸¸ç ÀÌÁ÷Àǵµ´Â 45Á¡ ¸¸Á¡¿¡ 31.08Á¡À̾ú´Ù. ÀÌÂ÷ ¿Ü»ó¼º ½ºÆ®·¹½º´Â ÀÌÁ÷Àǵµ¿Í ¾çÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è°¡ ÀÖ¾ú°í(r= .27, p<.001), ¹Ý¸é ¼Ò¸íÀǽÄÀº ÀÌÁ÷Àǵµ¿Í À½ÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù(r=- .26, p= .001). ´ÙÁßȸ±ÍºÐ¼® °á°ú¿¡¼­ ¼Ò¸íÀǽÄÀº ÀÌÁ÷Àǵµ¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ÁÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸³ª(¥â=- .22, p= .001), ÀÌÂ÷ ¿Ü»ó¼º ½ºÆ®·¹½º´Â °ü·ÃÀÌ ¾ø¾ú´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ È¥µ¿º¯¼ö Áß¿¡¼­´Â Á÷¹«½ºÆ®·¹½º(¥â= .56, p<.001)¿Í ¿Ü»ó¼¾Å͸¦ ÀÚ¹ßÀûÀ¸·Î Áö¿øÇÑ °æ¿ì(¥â=-.13, p=.035)°¡ ÀÌÁ÷Àǵµ¿Í °ü·ÃÀÌ ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ °á°úµéÀº ¿Ü»ó¼¾ÅÍ °£È£»çÀÇ ¼Ò¸íÀǽÄÀÌ ³ôÀ»¼ö·Ï ÀÌÁ÷Àǵµ°¡ ³·¾ÆÁö´Â °ÍÀ» ÀǹÌÇÑ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ¿Ü»ó¼¾ÅÍ °£È£»çÀÇ ÀÌÁ÷Àǵµ¸¦ ÁÙÀ̱â À§Çؼ­´Â ¿Ü»ó°£È£»çÀÇ ¼Ò¸íÀǽÄÀ» °íÃë½ÃÅ°±â À§ÇÑ ÇàÁ¤ÀûÀÎ Áö¿øÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÒ °ÍÀÌ´Ù.

Purpose: This study was done to examine the influence of secondary trauma stress, and vocation on turnover intention of nurses in regional trauma centers.

Methods: For this study a descriptive cross-sectional study using questionnaires was used. Data were collected from 170 nurses working in regional trauma centers in 10 hospitals. Data collection period was March and April, 2019.

Results: The mean score for secondary trauma stress was 27.66 out of 50, vocation, 36.04 out of 54, and turnover intention, 31.08 out of 45. Secondary trauma stress was positively related to turnover intention (r=.27, p<.001), whereas vocation was negatively related to turnover intention among trauma nurses (r=-.26, p=.001). In multiple regression analysis, vocation was associated with turnover intention among trauma nurses (¥â=-.22, p=.001), however secondary trauma stress was not related. Among the adjusted confounding variables, job stress (¥â=.56, p<.001), and in case of selection of trauma center voluntarily (¥â=-.13, p=.035) was also associated with turnover intention.

Conclusion: The study results suggest that higher vocation was associated lower turnover intention among trauma nurses. To reduce the turnover intention among trauma nurses, it is necessary to encourage trauma nurses¡¯ vocation with administrative support.
KeyWords
¿Ü»ó¼¾ÅÍ, °£È£»ç, ¼Ò¸íÀǽÄ
Nurses, Trauma center, Vocation
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
  
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed